brain training perks with neuroscience & neurolingistics cutting-edge knowledge, experience and trends will improve and boost your brain health and all your learning | education | lingüistics | english as a second language | ESL | ELT | second language acquisition | learning & teaching | neuroscience | neurology | holistic methodologies | management | effective communication | liaising with clients | travelling & tourism | general news | animal protectionism | youtube curator
I prepared this summary to introduce you to the topic:
The Higgs boson is the fundamental particle associated with the Higgs field, a field that gives mass to other fundamental particles such as electrons and quarks. A particle’s mass determines how much it resists changing its speed or position when it encounters a force.
In the Higgs boson’s case, the field came first. The Higgs field was proposed in 1964 as a new kind of field that fills the entire Universe and gives mass to all elementary particles. The Higgs boson is a wave in that field. Its discovery confirms the existence of the Higgs field.
The Higgs boson underpins the whole Standard Model like a jigsaw piece, spurring on our curiosity and creating a more accurate picture of the universe around us. Since the beginning of humanity, curiosity has fuelled the advancement of science.
The key distinguishing feature of Higgs’s contribution was that, as an afterthought, he predicted the existence of a new massive particle left over from the process he had worked out in the Highlands. This particle would later bear his name: the Higgs boson.
The Higgs boson is the only fundamental particle known to be scalar, meaning it has no quantum spin. This fact answers questions about our universe, but it also raises new ones.
The Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism introduced a new quantum field that today we call the Higgs field, whose quantum manifestation is the Higgs boson. Only particles that interact with the Higgs field acquire mass. “It is exactly this mechanism,” Cerutti adds, “that creates all the complexity of the Standard Model.”
There was not yet any direct evidence that the Higgs field existed, but even without direct proof, the accuracy of its predictions led scientists to believe the theory might be true.
What did Stephen Hawking say about Higgs boson?
Quote/What Hawking said in 2013 when the discovery of the Higgs boson was confirmed: “physics would be far more interesting if [the Higgs boson] had not been found”.
When Stephen Hawking and I visited the Large Hadron Collider, he hoped for an unexpected physics breakthrough. His dreams may not be impossible. “I hope you’ll make black holes,” Stephen said with a broad smile.
The elusive ‘God particle’ discovered by scientists in 2012 has the potential to destroy the universe, famed British physicist Stephen Hawking has warned. According to Hawking, at very high energy levels the Higgs boson, which gives shape and size to everything that exists, could become unstable. This, he said, could cause a “catastrophic vacuum decay” that would lead space and time to collapse.
Hawking was the first to set out a theory of cosmology explained by a union of the general theory of relativity and quantum mechanics. He was a vigorous supporter of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics.
7 Apr 2024
In this shocking video, a CERN scientist claims they have opened a portal to another dimension. Watch now for the mind-blowing details!
I prepared a summary just to give you some context and introduce you to this topic:
Free will, in philosophy and science, is the supposed power or capacity of humans to make decisions or perform actions independently of any prior event or state of the universe.
Philosophers have been debating fate vs. free will for centuries. Some believe that people’s lives and choices are predetermined, while others believe that humans are responsible for their own actions.
A person who is forced at gunpoint to do something, does so with considerably less free will than someone who does something voluntarily. Similarly, a person with a brain disorder that causes constant coughing lacks free will over their coughing, even though they likely retain free will in other ways.
Most of us are certain that we have free will, though what exactly this amounts to is much less certain. According to David Hume, the question of the nature of free will is “the most contentious question of metaphysics.” If this is correct, then figuring out what free will is will be no small task indeed.
Most neuroscientists believe humans have at least some degree of free will. So do most philosophers and the vast majority of the general population. Free will is essential to how we see ourselves, fuelling the satisfaction of achievement or the shame of failing to do the right thing.
There is a kind of free will that we don’t, and cannot have, which is called Absolute Free Will. This is the kind that allows us to do otherwise for any previous decision. This type of free will is required for Moral Responsibility because if someone could not have done otherwise then they are not morally responsible.
Stanford neurobiologist Robert Sapolsky believes humans have no free will. By studying baboons in Africa and human behaviour for decades, he’s concluded neurochemical influences determine human behaviour. The supposition should create a more just world, Sapolsky claims.
Here the paradox is that not only is the status of the concept a matter for debate, but the very existence of free will as a subject of research remains unclear.
Many philosophers and theologians have however, taken the general idea of free will as a legitimate defense and explanation for the problem of evil. The (religious) argument is made that God desires free creatures, free creatures are created, and therefore it is the free creatures that bring evil into the world.
Most psychologists use the concept of free will to express the idea that behaviour is not a passive reaction to forces but that individuals actively respond to internal and external forces.
14 Mar 2024
Is there a quantum reason we could have free will? Neil deGrasse Tyson and comedian Chuck Nice explore the concept of free will and predetermination with neuroscientist, biologist, and author of Determined: The Science of Life Without Free Will, Robert Sapolsky.
A special thanks from our editors to Robert Sapolsky’s dog.
Could we put an end to the question of whether or not we have free will? Discover “The Hungry Judge Effect” and how little bits of biology affect our actions. We break down a physicist’s perspective of free will, The Big Bang, and chaos theory. Is it enough to just feel like we have free will? Why is it an issue to think you have free will if you don’t?
We discuss the difference between free will in big decisions versus everyday decisions. How do you turn out to be the type of person who chooses vanilla ice cream over strawberry? We explore how quantum physics and virtual particles factor into predetermination. Could quantum randomness change the actions of an atom? How can society best account for a lack of free will? Are people still responsible for their actions?
What would Chuck do if he could do anything he wanted? We also discuss the benefits of a society that acknowledges powers outside of our control and scientific advancements made. How is meritocracy impacted by free will? Plus, can you change if people believe in free will if they have no free will in believing so?
Thanks to our Patrons Pro Handyman, Brad K. Daniels, Starman, Stephen Somers, Nina Kane, Paul Applegate, and David Goldberg for supporting us this week.
A special thanks from our editors to Robert Sapolsky’s dog.
NOTE: StarTalk+ Patrons can listen to this entire episode commercial-free.
31 Jan 2024
Does free will truly exist, or are we merely sophisticated meat machines running our biochemical programming with sentience as a byproduct? Stanford University neurologist Robert Sapolsky, having extensively studied the topic, asserts that not only is free will a myth but also that our insistence on its reality adversely affects the world we inhabit. In this episode, Adam speaks with Dr. Sapolsky about how choice is an illusion and the impact this has on our society, from workplace meritocracies to criminal justice reform. Find Dr. Sapolsky’s book, Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will, at factuallypod.com/books
Does quantum entanglement make faster-than-light communication possible? What is NOT random? http://bit.ly/NOTrandoVe
First, I know this video is not easy to understand. Thank you for taking the time to attempt to understand it. I’ve been working on this for over six months over which time my understanding has improved. Quantum entanglement and spooky action at a distance are still debated by professors of quantum physics (I know because I discussed this topic with two of them).
Does hidden information (called hidden variables by physicists) exist? If it does, the experiment violating Bell inequalities indicates that hidden variables must update faster than light – they would be considered ‘non-local’. On the other hand if you don’t consider the spins before you make the measurement then you could simply say hidden variables don’t exist and whenever you measure spins in the same direction you always get opposite results, which makes sense since angular momentum must be conserved in the universe.
Everyone agrees that quantum entanglement does not allow information to be transmitted faster that light. There is no action either detector operator could take to signal the other one – regardless of the choice of measurement direction, the measured spins are random with 50/50 probability of up/down.
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that you can never simultaneously know the exact position and the exact speed of an object. Why not? Because everything in the universe behaves like both a particle and a wave at the same time. Chad Orzel navigates this complex concept of quantum physics.
11 Jul 2023
The race between J. Robert Oppenheimer and Werner Heisenberg during World War II to develop the atomic bomb is a fascinating chapter in the history of science and warfare.
Oppenheimer, an American theoretical physicist, led the Manhattan Project, the United States’ secret endeavour to develop the first nuclear weapons. He was instrumental in bringing together a diverse group of top scientists, including many European refugees, to work on this project at Los Alamos, New Mexico. Under Oppenheimer’s leadership, the team successfully developed and tested the world’s first atomic bomb in July 1945.
On the other side of the Atlantic, Werner Heisenberg, a German theoretical physicist and one of the key pioneers of quantum mechanics, was leading Nazi Germany’s nuclear weapon project. However, Heisenberg’s efforts were not as successful. There are many theories as to why Germany’s atomic bomb project failed, ranging from lack of resources and Allied bombing campaigns to Heisenberg’s possible moral qualms about creating such a devastating weapon.
In the end, the race was decisively won by Oppenheimer and the Manhattan Project. The atomic bombs they developed were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, leading to Japan’s surrender and the end of World War II. The legacy of this race, however, has had profound and lasting impacts on global politics, ethics, and the scientific community.
25 Nov 2020
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle says that if we know everything about where a particle is located, we know nothing about its momentum. Conversely, if we know everything about its momentum, then we know nothing about where the particle is located. In other words, this principle means that we cannot measure the position and momentum of a particle with absolute precision or certainty.
But waves, as you know, don’t exist in one specific place. However, you can certainly identify and measure specific characteristics of a wave pattern as a whole, most notably, its wavelength, which is the distance between two consecutive crests or troughs. Particles that are as small or even smaller than atoms have large enough wavelengths to be detected, and can therefore be measured in experiments.
Thus, if we have a wave whose wavelength and momentum can be measured accurately, then it’s impossible to measure its specific position. Conversely, if we know the position of a particle with high certainty, then we cannot accurately determine its momentum. This is what Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is all about.
29 Jun 2020
In 1939, Werner Heisenberg joined the “Uranium Club” to try to make a nuclear bomb for Hitler. Why? He didn’t love the Nazis and he had plenty of opportunities to leave. This is the story of the moral failings of a brilliant man.
14 Jan 2013
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle tells us that it is impossible to simultaneously measure the position and momentum of a particle with infinite precision. In our everyday lives we virtually never come up against this limit, hence why it seems peculiar. In this experiment a laser is shone through a narrow slit onto a screen. As the slit is made narrower, the spot on the screen also becomes narrower. But at a certain point, the spot starts becoming wider. This is because the photons of light have been so localised at the slit that their horizontal momentum must become less well defined in order to satisfy Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle.
27 Sept 2017
Hungarian-American physicist, Edward Teller (1908-2003), helped to develop the atomic bomb and provided the theoretical framework for the hydrogen bomb. He remained a staunch advocate of nuclear power, calling for the development of advanced thermonuclear weapons. [Listener: John H. Nuckolls]
TRANSCRIPT: I would like to finish my story about Bohr and, in a way, about Heisenberg, by telling you of a very sad fact. When the Nazis came, when Hitler occupied Denmark, Bohr was in danger of his life. He had a Jewish grandfather, I think, at least. He was to escape. Shortly before that, Heisenberg listened- came to him. Bohr came out to America and told us that Heisenberg is working on the atomic bomb for the Nazis. Heisenberg and Bohr have been good friends. Bohr did enormous damage to Heisenberg’s reputation. I heard him say that, I even heard him say that in a one-to-one conversation. I never quite believed it. I went back to Germany, found out – in more ways than in a short time I can tell you – but found out what actually happened. Heisenberg went to visit Bohr, he had to talk with him. He talked with him in his home, the Carlsberg Castle, the, the beer producing Carlsberg people or- I don’t know whether it was beer, but they gave it to Bohr. And when they were talking indoors and Heisenberg was afraid that there might be- that the Nazis might have put in listening apparatus, he said things- I am working for my government and it’s good to work for my country. That is what Bohr quoted. Then they went out into the garden and Heisenberg was no longer afraid. And then he added- I am with a group working on the atomic bomb. I hope we won’t succeed. I hope the Americans won’t succeed either. I cannot do otherwise than give an ab- abbreviated version of all this but here is one point, one generalization which I would like to make. My years in Germany, about which I want to talk a little more later, have been at a wonderful constructive period of science. Hitler destroyed it. You were not allowed to talk about Einstein. A Jewish lie, relativity. Heisenberg resisted it. I have many detailed indications that Heisenberg, if he did not directly sabotage the work on the atomic bomb, he never seriously worked on it. After war he and maybe ten other people were taken to a place in England and kept there and now the British did listen by secret apparatus to what they were saying to each other. I couldn’t get that record until two years ago when it was published. And Heisenberg said about atomic bombs some of things which clearly prove that he did not think about the subject. They were told in August 1945 that we’d dropped an atomic bomb and the Germans didn’t believe it. And then Heisenberg told them- Perhaps they did, and explained to them how the atomic bomb worked, wrongly so. A point about which I am very proud because the mistake that Heisenberg then made, I made a few years earlier when I was starting to think about it – and found out within a few months that it was wrong. That Heisenberg should make the same mistake gives me pleasure. But it shows, in the case of the excellent intelligence of Heisenberg, that he never seriously tried to work on the subject.
All Physicists In Oppenheimer & Their Scientific Contributions
6 Aug 2023
In the crucible of World War II, amidst chaos and conflict, a clandestine assembly of brilliant minds, under the leadership of J. Robert Oppenheimer, embarked on an unprecedented mission with far-reaching consequences. One of the key figures in this endeavour was Ernest Lawrence, portrayed by Josh Hartnett, who revolutionized cyclotrons and contributed to the discovery of elements through nuclear fission. Leo Szilard, played by Máté Haumann, was instrumental in initiating the project, urging President Roosevelt to develop atomic weapons and later advocating for a peaceful use of atomic energy. Niels Bohr, portrayed by Kenneth Branagh, provided valuable advice and continued to champion peaceful applications of atomic knowledge. Edward Teller, known as “the father of the hydrogen bomb,” played by While Safdie, played a pivotal role in the development of fusion-based weapons, despite differences with Oppenheimer.
Hans Bethe, portrayed by Gustaf Skarsgård, oversaw the crucial T (Theoretical) Division that calculated the power of the atomic bomb and later became an advocate for arms control. Isidor Isaac Rabi, played by David Krumholtz, brought scientific expertise and organizational skills to the project, supporting Oppenheimer during his hearings. David Hill, portrayed by Rami Malik, testified against unfair treatment of Oppenheimer during Strauss’s Senate confirmation hearing. Vannevar Bush, played by Matthew Modin, played a crucial administrative role in initiating and prioritizing the Manhattan Project. Robert Serber, played by Michael Angarano, provided essential lectures and theories vital to the atomic bomb’s design. Richard Feynman, portrayed by Jack Quaid, developed critical formulas and contributed to safety procedures. Albert Einstein, portrayed by Tom Conti, lent his support to the nuclear program after being convinced by Szilard.
Kenneth Bainbridge, played by Josh Peck, directed the Trinity test, and Enrico Fermi, portrayed by Danny Deferrari, led the creation of the first nuclear reactor. Seth Neddermeyer, played by Devon Bostick, supported the implosion technique, and Luis Walter Alvarez, portrayed by Alex Wolff, made crucial inventions for the bomb’s success. Klaus Fuchs, portrayed by Christopher Denham, infamously spied for the Soviet Union, and Werner Heisenberg, played by Matthias Schweighöfer, played a significant role in Germany’s atomic program. Together, these brilliant scientists’ collective genius gave birth to the most devastating weapon the world had ever seen, ending the greatest war in history.
11 Dec 2022
Max Born Biography, German Mathematician and Physicist’s Life and Contributions to Science Name Surname: Max Born Date of Birth: 11 December 1882 From: Poland Occupations: Physicist , Mathematician Death Date: 05 January 1970 Max Born , German mathematician and physicist who was influential in the development of quantum theory .
He also contributed to solid state physics and optics and supervised the work of important physicists in the 1920s-30s. Born received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1954 for his work “On researching the basis of quantum mechanics , especially on statistical interpretation of the wave function”
19 Jul 2023
Upon returning to Los Alamos in 1983 for the lab’s 40th anniversary, Rabi told CBS News he had “sorrow that the place still exists.”
29 Dec 2023
“Why do we have to do it this way?” “Wouldn’t it be better to do it another way?” Ask a lot of questions. A person who asks a lot of good questions can create something different from others. Because our brains are programmed to answer questions.
27 Sept 2017
Hungarian-American physicist, Edward Teller (1908-2003), helped to develop the atomic bomb and provided the theoretical framework for the hydrogen bomb. He remained a staunch advocate of nuclear power, calling for the development of advanced thermonuclear weapons. [Listener: John H. Nuckolls]
TRANSCRIPT: I would like to finish my story about Bohr and, in a way, about Heisenberg, by telling you of a very sad fact. When the Nazis came, when Hitler occupied Denmark, Bohr was in danger of his life. He had a Jewish grandfather, I think, at least. He was to escape. Shortly before that, Heisenberg listened- came to him. Bohr came out to America and told us that Heisenberg is working on the atomic bomb for the Nazis. Heisenberg and Bohr have been good friends. Bohr did enormous damage to Heisenberg‘s reputation.
I heard him say that, I even heard him say that in a one-to-one conversation. I never quite believed it. I went back to Germany, found out – in more ways than in a short time I can tell you – but found out what actually happened. Heisenberg went to visit Bohr, he had to talk with him. He talked with him in his home, the Carlsberg Castle, the, the beer producing Carlsberg people or- I don’t know whether it was beer, but they gave it to Bohr. And when they were talking indoors and Heisenberg was afraid that there might be- that the Nazis might have put in listening apparatus, he said things- I am working for my government and it’s good to work for my country.
That is what Bohr quoted. Then they went out into the garden and Heisenberg was no longer afraid. And then he added- I am with a group working on the atomic bomb. I hope we won’t succeed. I hope the Americans won’t succeed either. I cannot do otherwise than give an ab- abbreviated version of all this but here is one point, one generalization which I would like to make. My years in Germany, about which I want to talk a little more later, have been at a wonderful constructive period of science. Hitler destroyed it. You were not allowed to talk about Einstein. A Jewish lie, relativity. Heisenberg resisted it. I have many detailed indications that Heisenberg, if he did not directly sabotage the work on the atomic bomb, he never seriously worked on it.
After war he and maybe ten other people were taken to a place in England and kept there and now the British did listen by secret apparatus to what they were saying to each other. I couldn’t get that record until two years ago when it was published. And Heisenberg said about atomic bombs some of things which clearly prove that he did not think about the subject. They were told in August 1945 that we’d dropped an atomic bomb and the Germans didn’t believe it. And then Heisenberg told them- Perhaps they did, and explained to them how the atomic bomb worked, wrongly so.
A point about which I am very proud because the mistake that Heisenberg then made, I made a few years earlier when I was starting to think about it – and found out within a few months that it was wrong. That Heisenberg should make the same mistake gives me pleasure. But it shows, in the case of the excellent intelligence of Heisenberg, that he never seriously tried to work on the subject.
8 Apr 2019
Top 20 Quotes of Isidor Isaac Rabi: ■ I think physicists are the Peter Pans of the human race. They never grow up and they keep their curiosity. ■ My mother made me a scientist without ever intending to. Every other Jewish mother in Brooklyn would ask her child after school, So? Did you learn anything today? But not my mother. Izzy, she would say, did you ask a good question today? That difference – asking good questions – made me become a scientist. ■ If you decide you don’t have to get A’s, you can learn an enormous amount in college. ■ [Science is] a great game. It is inspiring and refreshing. The playing field is the universe itself. ■ As yet, if a man has no feeling for art he is considered narrow-minded, but if he has no feeling for science this is considered quite normal. This is a fundamental weakness. ■ Physics filled me with awe, put me in touch with a sense of original causes. Physics brought me closer to God. That feeling stayed with me throughout my years in science. Whenever one of my students came to me with a scientific project, I asked only one question, ‘Will it bring you nearer to God?’ ■ There are questions which illuminate, and there are those that destroy. I was always taught to ask the first kind. ■ The scientist does not defy the universe. He accepts it. It is his dish to savour, his realm to explore; it is his adventure and never-ending delight. It is complaisant and elusive but never dull. It is wonderful both in the small and in the large. In short, its exploration is the highest occupation for a gentleman. ■ Physics is an other-world thing, it requires a taste for things unseen, even unheard of- a high degree of abstraction… These faculties die off somehow when you grow up… profound curiosity happens when children are young. I think physicists are the Peter Pans of the human race… Once you are sophisticated, you know too much- far too much. Pauli once said to me, “I know a great deal. I know too much. I am a quantum ancient.”. ■ You know that, according to quantum theory, if two particles collide with enough energy you can, in principle, with an infinitesimal probability, produce two grand pianos. ■ Science itself is badly in need of integration and unification. The tendency is more and more the other way … Only the graduate student, poor beast of burden that he is, can be expected to know a little of each. As the number of physicists increases, each specialty becomes more self-sustaining and self-contained. Such Balkanization carries physics, and indeed, every science further away, from natural philosophy, which, intellectually, is the meaning and goal of science. ■ It was eerie. I saw myself in that machine. I never thought my work would come to this. Upon seeing a distorted image of his face, reflected on the inside cylindrical surface of the bore while inside an MRI (magnetic-resonance-imaging) machine-a device made possible by his early physical researches on nuclear magnetic resonance (1938). ■ We must also teach science not as the bare body of fact, but more as human endeavor in its historic context-in the context of the effects of scientific thought on every kind of thought. We must teach it as an intellectual pursuit rather than as a body of tricks. ■ To me, science is an expression of the human spirit, which reaches every sphere of human culture. It gives an aim and meaning to existence as well as a knowledge, understanding, love, and admiration for the world. It gives a deeper meaning to morality and another dimension to esthetics. ■ There isn’t a scientific community. It is a culture. It is a very undisciplined organization. ■ Most new insights come only after a superabundant accumulation of facts have removed the blindness which prevented us from seeing what later comes to be regarded as obvious. ■ My ideal man is Benjamin Franklin-the figure in American history most worthy of emulation … Franklin is my ideal of a whole man. … Where are the life-size-or even pint-size-Benjamin Franklins of today? ■ Suddenly, there was an enormous flash of light, the brightest light I have ever seen or that I think anyone has ever seen. It blasted; it pounced; it bored its way into you. It was a vision which was seen with more than the eye. It was seen to last forever. You would wish it would stop; altogether it lasted about two seconds. ■ It was eerie. I saw myself in that machine. I never thought my work would come to this. ■ We gave you an atomic bomb, what do you want, mermaids?
6 Oct 2020
Isidor Isaac Rabi was an American physicist who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1944 for his discovery of nuclear magnetic resonance, which is used in magnetic resonance imaging.
In this short clip, Best-selling author and physicist Safi Bahcall explains the one reason that Rabi gave as to how we won the Nobel Prize.
To delve into knottier topics that exist within Oppenheimer, Christopher Nolan’s critically-acclaimed new film about the creator of the atomic bomb, Esquire hosted a conversation between Nolan and Professor Brian Cox – no stranger to communicating complicated science on a mass scale.
How, exactly, do you prepare a cast for a film of this scale and scientific complexity? What’s up with those black-and-white scenes?
And how does Oppenheimer fit alongside Nolan’s much-loved filmography, from time-travel thriller Tenet to wartime epic Dunkirk?
You will not need a science textbook to understand everything going on, but it might be helpful to have Google open.
17 Jul 2023
Christopher Nolan, Matt Damon, Emily Blunt, Cillian Murphy and Robert Downey Jr. chat about their new film ‘Oppenheimer’ and reveal how they each landed their role.
Like Alice in Wonderland … everything is upside down … even time !
22 Oct 2022
Space time travelling using worm holes changes our traditional human-understanding of time.
I’m surprised Sabine did not cite the foremost authority on retro-causality – the White Queen: ‘I don’t understand you,’ said Alice, ‘It’s dreadfully confusing!’ ‘That’s the effect of living backwards,’ the Queen said kindly: ‘it always makes one a little giddy at first — but there’s one great advantage in it, that one’s memory works both ways’
Retrocausality, a mind-blowing quantum concept, proposes that future events impact the past. Challenging time’s traditional flow and exploring interconnected temporal relationships. Can the universe communicate with its past-self?
What actually was before the Big Bang? One person who thinks he has found a conclusive answer to this question is the British star mathematician Roger Pemrose. Already in the 1960s, the scientist put forward theories according to which our universe is subject to a constant cycle of birth, becoming and passing away. However, Penrose, who is now over 90 years old, does not believe in the multiverse. We look in this video at the proofs, why our present universe can have developed only from a predecessor cosmos and why black holes prove the existence of aliens.
In a groundbreaking discovery, astronomers have found evidence of another universe at the edge of our own. The James Webb Telescope has captured images of a colossal galaxy that dwarfs our own Milky Way, alongside a pint-sized galaxy that was previously deemed too small to exist. This unexpected discovery has sent shockwaves through the astronomy community, with experts scrambling to explain how such a strange cosmic pairing could have come to be.
Join us as we take an in-depth look at the recent discovery made by the James Webb Telescope, detailing the key findings and what they could mean for our understanding of the universe. We delved deeper to find Dr. Michio Kaku’s opinions on his interview recently about this groundbreaking discovery.
What’s more, we’ll take a look at the implications of this discovery for our understanding of the Big Bang theory, and what it could mean for the future of space exploration. With expert commentary and detailed analysis, this video is a must-watch for anyone interested in astronomy and the mysteries of the universe.
18 May 2023
Black holes, extraordinary cosmic phenomena capable of bending and trapping light with their immense gravitational pull, continue to intrigue scientists. These enigmatic entities are scattered throughout our galaxy, including the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, dwarfing our Sun by four million times in mass. While striving to comprehend the formation and dynamics of these powerful objects, scientists have made a startling discovery that has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the universe. Join us on an exploration into the mysteries of black holes, delving into recent revelations and contemplating their implications for the future of humanity.
brain-perks 